Best (Allied) Fighter-Bomber of WW2
Posted 29 October 2008 - 03:12 AM
I guess half the battle in this discussion is determining what precisely is a fighter bomber?
For the purposes of this poll I am considering fighters that were pressed into service as ground support/attack aircraft, whilst maintaing their core duty as fighter aircraft.
The Nominees are:
1. Hawker Typhoon
2. Republic P-47 Thunderbolt
3. Lockheed P-38 Lightning
4. Vought F4U Corsair
5. de Havilland Mosquito FBVI
(Only allowed 4 images!)
Posted 29 October 2008 - 11:40 PM
Posted 30 October 2008 - 06:50 AM
Posted 30 October 2008 - 04:19 PM
In my opinion, a FANTASTIC fighter-bomber.
The singles in this thread are more fighter than bomber, and the twins are more bomber than fighter (with the P-38, as always, the exception).
Posted 17 December 2008 - 04:23 PM
In the ground-attack role, radial-engined fighters were at an advantage. My crew-chief in P-47s said he saw them limping home with engine-cylinders shot-off, and the remaining pistons flailing about in the air. That P-38 and Mossie have two engines, so the redundancy would likely get them back home to base.
I'll vote for the P-47 Thunderbolt AND the F4U Corsair.
If allowed only one vote... the P-47.
Posted 18 December 2008 - 08:23 AM
Mind you, for cost-effectiveness a single-engined design is better. In that case, I'd plump for the Typhoon, on the argument that cannon are a better all-round weapon than machineguns (runs for cover). Just don't try to ditch it in the sea!
Posted 18 December 2008 - 12:47 PM
Posted 16 March 2010 - 10:28 AM
Posted 16 March 2010 - 03:32 PM
Hi, its a so nice and good site ever. Its a really great and fantastic post here in this site. So, thank you for the sharing of your ideas and thoughts to all of us.
Welcome, and thanks for the kind words. Now its your turn to share your ideas and thoughts with us. Don't be shy. We all will enjoy hearing from you.
Did you vote for your favorite fighter bomber?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users