View Full Version : Grokhovsky G-38 "Light Cruiser"
ChrisMcD
24th September 2005, 06:08
This is a new one for me.
Looks like it predates the Grumman/Bristol for short nosed twins
http://www.geocities.com/unicraftmodels/on/g38/g38.htm
What happened it looks like it should have worked
PMN1
24th September 2005, 06:26
Straight from Skywalker Ranch????
There's even a spot for an R2 unit behind the cockpit!!!
:)[8D]
Kutscha
24th September 2005, 09:15
The ultimate P-38 Lightning.[:p]
Mark J
24th September 2005, 21:27
Another candidate for Tony
cheers
simon
24th September 2005, 21:47
That is possibly one of the worst quality kits I think I've ever seen! It looks like it's been made of plasticine pushed into cheap moulds.
An interesting "What-if" subject, but seriously, with the pieces needing that much cleaning up what is the fit of the parts likely to be like?
This looks like a "Patience and Putty required..." model.
simon
24th September 2005, 21:50
Thought I'd seen this little beauty before.
http://www.tgplanes.com/Public/snitz/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=591&SearchTerms=grokhovsky
ChrisMcD
25th September 2005, 05:26
Hi Simon,
I had checked, but only came across the reference after I had posted. Sodds Law!
I did find some more references in Vaclav Nemecek's book on Soviet Aircraft.
It was not flown because Grokhovsky's group was 'dissolved' just after it was finished.
Earlier machines (ie G-37) were of similar twin engine/twin boom design, but as transports with a respectable performance.
The G-38 had a very small wingspan (13.6m) and a wing loading of 160kg/sq m so there was concern about the probability of a very high landing speed. But it was heavily armed, with an armament of 2 X 20mm ShVak cannons and 4 forward firing machine guns, plus two more in flexible mountings .
It was supposed to have a top speed of 550kph/340 mph - not bad for 1936
But with that stubby wing and long thin tailbooms it would have probably been tricky to fly
Just like the Mig-1!
So potentialy one of the best twin engined fighters of the late 30's - could it have influenced the P-38?
simon
25th September 2005, 06:39
Hmmm, clicking on that link I get RTF's post, perhapds a "bump" is in order...
Double T
25th September 2005, 06:43
I must admit I've never seen this aircraft before. Thanks for sharing.
While I think it looks very good in profile and from above, I still cast my vote for the Grumman XF5F-1 Skyrocket--long-nose. (I'm a hopeless 'Ironworks' fan.)
Tim
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.